Free LLM API Pricing Tool

AI Token Cost Calculator

Instantly calculate and compare API token costs across OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok and more — before you commit a single dollar to your LLM budget.

23+
AI Models
6
Providers
3
Calc Modes
100%
Free Forever
✦ OpenAI GPT-4o / GPT-4.1 ✦ Claude Sonnet / Opus ✦ Gemini 2.5 Pro ✦ DeepSeek V3 ✦ Grok 3 ✦ Mistral
Token & Cost Estimator
📝 Text Input
🔢 Manual Token Count
📊 Monthly Usage
Characters: 0 Words: 0 Est. Input Tokens: 0
100%
% of input tokens expected as output
💡 We'll project your costs per day, week, and month across all selected models.

📊 Cost Breakdown Across All Providers

Input Tokens
Output Tokens
Total Tokens
API Calls
Cheapest Option
Cheapest Cost
Sort by:
Provider / Model Input Cost Cached Input Output Cost Total (× Calls)

How to Use the Token Cost Calculator

1

Choose Your Input Method

Paste your actual prompt text into the Text Input tab for an automatic token count — or switch to Manual Token Count if you already know your token figures from a previous API call.

2

Set Output Ratio & Call Volume

Adjust the output token ratio slider to reflect how verbose the model's response typically is. Enter the number of API calls you expect to make (daily, weekly, or in a single batch).

3

Filter Providers

Toggle the provider checkboxes to focus on the APIs you're actually evaluating — whether that's OpenAI vs Claude head-to-head, or a full LLM market comparison.

4

Hit Calculate & Review

Click "Calculate Token Costs" to see a live breakdown across all selected models — including input cost, output cost, cached token savings, and a total per-call and aggregate figure.

5

Project Monthly Spend

Switch to the Monthly Usage tab, enter your daily call volume and average token sizes, then calculate to see projected daily, weekly, and monthly costs — perfect for budget planning.

Why Token Pricing Deserves More Attention Than You're Giving It

Most teams building on top of LLM APIs treat token costs as a line item to deal with later — usually when the invoice lands and someone has to explain a five-figure API bill to the CFO. That's the wrong order of operations. Token pricing isn't a marginal concern; it's core infrastructure economics, and it compounds fast at production scale.

The pricing structures across providers are not remotely comparable on a surface level. OpenAI charges separately for input and output tokens, with output tokens running roughly 3–5× more expensive per million than input tokens on flagship models. Anthropic's Claude pricing follows the same structure but adds prompt caching — a mechanism that can slash costs by up to 90% on repeated context, which matters enormously for RAG pipelines and multi-turn agents. Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro has a context-length-based pricing tier: prompts under 200K tokens are billed at one rate, above that triggers a premium. If your retrieval pipeline routinely stuffs 250K tokens of context into every call, that distinction is non-trivial.

DeepSeek's V3 model changed the calculus for cost-sensitive workloads in 2025. At a fraction of GPT-4o pricing with competitive reasoning performance, it's a legitimate option for classification, extraction, and summarisation tasks that don't require frontier-level intelligence. The calculation isn't always "use the cheapest model" — it's "use the cheapest model that hits your quality floor." This tool gives you the cost side of that equation; your evals give you the quality side.

Three variables to track that most teams ignore: (1) cached token ratios — if your system prompt is large and consistent across calls, caching can make a significant dent in costs on Claude and Gemini; (2) output verbosity — models that write longer responses by default cost more at scale, and prompt engineering to constrain output length is free; (3) batch vs real-time — OpenAI's Batch API offers 50% cost reduction for asynchronous workloads, which is transformative for data processing pipelines. Run this calculator against your actual call patterns, not hypotheticals. The numbers will tell you where to optimise first.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the token cost calculator estimate token count from text?
Token count is estimated using a standard approximation of 4 characters per token — the widely accepted heuristic used by OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google for English-language text. This aligns with the cl100k_base tokenizer used by GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 models. For precise token counts, especially for non-English languages or code-heavy prompts, you should use the model provider's native tokenizer (such as OpenAI's tiktoken library). This calculator gives you a fast, reliable estimate suitable for budget planning and cost comparisons across providers.
What is the difference between input tokens, output tokens, and cached tokens?
Input tokens are the tokens in the prompt you send to the model — including your system message, user message, conversation history, and any documents you pass in as context. Output tokens are the tokens the model generates in its response. Output tokens are typically billed at a higher rate because they require active computation (autoregressive generation), while input tokens are processed in a single forward pass. Cached tokens (available on Claude via prompt caching, and on Gemini via context caching) are input tokens retrieved from a server-side cache rather than reprocessed. They're billed at a significant discount — often 80–90% less than standard input token rates — making them highly valuable for applications with consistent large system prompts or repeated context.
Which LLM model is the cheapest for API use in 2025?
For raw cost per token, DeepSeek V3 and Mistral's smaller models consistently sit at the bottom of the price table. GPT-4o-mini and Claude Haiku 3.5 offer a strong balance of capability and cost for production workloads that don't need top-tier reasoning. If you need full frontier-model intelligence, the cost-per-token ranking as of mid-2025 typically runs: DeepSeek V3 < Gemini Flash < GPT-4o-mini / Claude Haiku < GPT-4.1 / Gemini 2.5 Pro < Claude Sonnet < Claude Opus / GPT-4o. The right choice depends on your quality threshold — a cheaper model running at 100% accuracy on your task is always the right choice over a premium model running at 102% accuracy at 10× the cost.
How do I calculate OpenAI API costs for a production application?
Start by profiling a representative sample of real calls — log the input token count, output token count, and completion latency across at least 100–200 production-like requests. This gives you an accurate average rather than a theoretical estimate. Then multiply: (avg input tokens × input price per token) + (avg output tokens × output price per token) = cost per call. Multiply by your expected daily call volume to get daily spend, then ×30 for monthly. Factor in batch API discounts if your workload is asynchronous (50% off), and cached input tokens if your system prompt is large and consistent (up to 50% off on OpenAI). This calculator handles all of that arithmetic automatically — just feed it your profiled averages.
Does this token calculator support image token costs?
This calculator focuses on text token costs across all major LLM providers. Image tokens (used in vision-capable models like GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 2.5 Pro) are calculated differently by each provider. OpenAI uses a tile-based system where image cost depends on resolution and detail level — a high-detail 1024×1024 image costs roughly 765 tokens. Anthropic calculates image tokens based on pixel dimensions: tokens = (width × height) / 750. For multimodal workloads with significant image volume, we recommend using the provider's native image token calculator alongside this tool's text cost estimates to get a combined figure.
Go to Top